<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goliaths&#8217; enforcement draws attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trademarkblog.ca/goliaths-enforcement-draws-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trademarkblog.ca/goliaths-enforcement-draws-attention/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Canadian Trademarks &#038; Technology Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:51:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Melliship</title>
		<link>http://www.trademarkblog.ca/goliaths-enforcement-draws-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Melliship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkblog.ca/goliaths-enforcement-draws-attention/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment. I agree wholeheartedly with you and ask you to bear with us as we find our own voice/perspective in the blogosphere. In hindsight, the posting on Google and IPOD should have been &quot;Canadianized&quot; (if that&#039;s a proper term) by referencing the efforts of Vanoc (which is the Vancouver Organizing Committee for the upcoming 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver/Whistler) to protect the various trademarks associated with the Olympics - for example by aggressively going after local Vancouver/Whistler businesses that have engaged in ambush marketing, which Vanoc defines as adopting the words &quot;Olympic&quot;, &quot;Vancouver 2010&quot; or anything similar after January 1998 - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vancouver2010.com/en/LookVancouver2010/ProtectingBrand/OlympicBrandFAQs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see this&lt;/a&gt;.
Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. I agree wholeheartedly with you and ask you to bear with us as we find our own voice/perspective in the blogosphere. In hindsight, the posting on Google and IPOD should have been &#8220;Canadianized&#8221; (if that&#8217;s a proper term) by referencing the efforts of Vanoc (which is the Vancouver Organizing Committee for the upcoming 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver/Whistler) to protect the various trademarks associated with the Olympics &#8211; for example by aggressively going after local Vancouver/Whistler businesses that have engaged in ambush marketing, which Vanoc defines as adopting the words &#8220;Olympic&#8221;, &#8220;Vancouver 2010&#8243; or anything similar after January 1998 &#8211; <a href="http://www.vancouver2010.com/en/LookVancouver2010/ProtectingBrand/OlympicBrandFAQs" rel="nofollow">see this</a>.<br />
Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TM Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.trademarkblog.ca/goliaths-enforcement-draws-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>TM Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkblog.ca/goliaths-enforcement-draws-attention/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>it strikes me that one of the challenges your blog will be faced with is commenting on matters that are as dynamic as those that consistently show up in the U.S., specifically, before the TTAB, while not simply repeating the offerings of other more established tm bloggers.

by way of example, i&#039;m referring to the Aug. 12th post from
http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/ concerning &quot;POD.&quot;

nevertheless, it&#039;s good to see some local action on the trademark blog front and i suspect in time a niche will develop.

congrats and i look forward to reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it strikes me that one of the challenges your blog will be faced with is commenting on matters that are as dynamic as those that consistently show up in the U.S., specifically, before the TTAB, while not simply repeating the offerings of other more established tm bloggers.</p>
<p>by way of example, i&#8217;m referring to the Aug. 12th post from<br />
<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/</a> concerning &#8220;POD.&#8221;</p>
<p>nevertheless, it&#8217;s good to see some local action on the trademark blog front and i suspect in time a niche will develop.</p>
<p>congrats and i look forward to reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
