<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interlocutory Injunctions in Trademark Cases:  A Difficult Test to Meet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trademarkblog.ca/interlocutory-injunctions-in-trademark-cases-a-difficult-test-to-meet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trademarkblog.ca/interlocutory-injunctions-in-trademark-cases-a-difficult-test-to-meet/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Canadian Trademarks &#038; Technology Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:58:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael webster</title>
		<link>http://www.trademarkblog.ca/interlocutory-injunctions-in-trademark-cases-a-difficult-test-to-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-34568</link>
		<dc:creator>michael webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkblog.ca/interlocutory-injunctions-in-trademark-cases-a-difficult-test-to-meet/#comment-34568</guid>
		<description>But on the flip side, the test for a permanent injunction after trial, is granted without showing any irreparable harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But on the flip side, the test for a permanent injunction after trial, is granted without showing any irreparable harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

