http://www.trademarkblog.ca/more-on-section-45/ Commentary on Canadian Trademarks & Technology Law Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:58:18 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 http://www.trademarkblog.ca/more-on-section-45/comment-page-1/#comment-31089 Canadian Trademark Blog » POM-POM Survives Section 45 Scrutiny Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:55:40 +0000 http://www.trademarkblog.ca/more-on-section-45/#comment-31089 [...] We recently reported on a number of section 45 decisions, the purpose of which is to remove “deadwood” or outdated registered trademarks from the Register. In such proceedings, the burden of proof is on the registered owner of the trademark to demonstrate “use” during the previous three year period in order to maintain the mark on the register. [...] [...] We recently reported on a number of section 45 decisions, the purpose of which is to remove “deadwood” or outdated registered trademarks from the Register. In such proceedings, the burden of proof is on the registered owner of the trademark to demonstrate “use” during the previous three year period in order to maintain the mark on the register. [...]

]]> http://www.trademarkblog.ca/more-on-section-45/comment-page-1/#comment-28203 trademark registration Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:10:21 +0000 http://www.trademarkblog.ca/more-on-section-45/#comment-28203 Interesting. The corresponding U.S. provision is much more lenient, it seems. Interesting. The corresponding U.S. provision is much more lenient, it seems.

]]>