<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perils of Insufficient Evidence in Trademark Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trademarkblog.ca/the-perils-of-insufficient-evidence-in-trademark-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trademarkblog.ca/the-perils-of-insufficient-evidence-in-trademark-cases/</link>
	<description>Commentary on Canadian Trademarks &#038; Technology Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:58:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAVACAF&#201;: Clearly Descriptive in the French Language : Canadian Trademark Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.trademarkblog.ca/the-perils-of-insufficient-evidence-in-trademark-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-153808</link>
		<dc:creator>JAVACAF&#201;: Clearly Descriptive in the French Language : Canadian Trademark Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkblog.ca/the-perils-of-insufficient-evidence-in-trademark-cases/#comment-153808</guid>
		<description>[...] up on an earlier blog posting, we note that the Supreme Court of Canada has refused leave to appeal from the Federal Court of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up on an earlier blog posting, we note that the Supreme Court of Canada has refused leave to appeal from the Federal Court of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

